November 2, 2021

On being everything to someone

It’s tempting to make projects that shoot for the broadest appeal – something for everyone. After all, if there’s something in it for everyone, then everyone will want it, right?

But the problem with ‘something for everyone’ is that it’s never everything for someone. And in a world of hyper-personalisation, where ads and products are being ever more targeted based on likes and interests, if it’s not everything for someone then it’s just irrelevant.

Because the internet can help us reach billions of people on any given day, shipping everything for someone is more likely to have that person pass it along to someone like them. And if that happens enough, if the work is specific enough and connects with enough of those people for whom you’ve made it, you’ve got an audience.

Depending on what you make, that audience may not be big enough to run a business or get the green light for a publisher, but even if that doesn’t happen you can sleep better at night knowing that you’ve made a difference to a few. It’s better than making a ho-hum difference (or none at all) to many.

Other observations
June 2, 2026

The Usual

Is there value in being consistent & predictable? Is there value in the opposite?

May 19, 2026

It came outta nowhere

Could thinking of ourselves as a characters in an unwritten movie help us process good and bad surprises and make the movie more interesting?

May 12, 2026

Lists work

How do I organise, prioritise and complete the life shrapnel that gets in the way of making more significant work? Can an empty square help?

May 5, 2026

Quentin Dupieux makes films

Why bother making a weird idea that’s really difficult to make if it won’t make you money, find an audience?

View all